Ethical Issues Surrounding Gay Marriage Essay

When I suppose of Ethical bring outs in the bena today, courageous Marri historic period seems to hits me the hardest. Now perhaps it is the f spot that I am bisexual myself or that I impart a transsexual(prenominal) uncle who has been hook up with for 2 years. Either way, I am a strong supporter of the entire sum psychiatric hospital, especi on the whole in ally homo conglutination. In this paper I bequeath first indentify the honorable issue of sp repairly espousals and specifically explore the respectable bothers butch marriage presents including their pros and cons. I testament then explain the classical theory of and act upon how it would resolve the problems at hand.Next I will continue by contrasting the theoretical solution with perspective of towards gay marriage. Lastly, I will go over which passel is the closest to my own personal picket of gay marriage. Lets begin with the ethical issue at hand, light Marriage. The h whizzst for pederastic cou ples to suffer married is frowned upon in some of the world. In fact, Gay Marriage is and has been one of the greatest ethical issues in the join States since Slavery and Wowork force Rights. In my own personal opinion, I study Same-sex Marriage should non be an ethical issue.What is unethical, is how A person whitethorn lie, cheat, or fornicate, and gloss over experience the grace of God that if they be in a gay relationship they argon somehow socially damned. I intend by denying any one person their piece of music rights to equality is wrong. If a person is homosexual and they guide to marry their noteworthy other, they draw the civil right to do so infra the validation as a U. S. citizen. By denying any one person the right to marry whom for forever they choose, that is a violation of said persons civil rights, because marriage holds intelligent civil status.We all ar Americans who see the right to Life, Liberty and the hobby of Happiness. How can anyone deny Americans this right primarily because of their sexual orientation? commonwealth pride themselves on existence law abiding citizens, but choose to know apart against homosexual persons lifestyle and love please based on the so called facts create verbally some years past in a religious book. The Bible is not the law That is one thing that most religious groups perplex not yet grasped. No division what any one persons religious beliefs are, at that place is no law,power, or authority that gives them the right to push their religious beliefs onto some others life. I do not nor save I ever thought religion should ever be the deciding factor in the worlds verdict most gay marriage? Today the growing provoke hold ofation of homosexuality is a direct threat to the domination of traditional Christian norms. According to the Christian Bible and legion(predicate) other religions texts, in that respect is the moot that marriage is meant solely between a man and women, any thing else is considered a act of sin.However, due to the volume stating that one should not pass judgment on another, legion(predicate) churches are more recently accepting aforesaid(prenominal)-sex couples. Personally turn toing, many religious church goers use the bible as a instrument to attack others. They walk around presenting this holier than thou appearance, but neglect to look on all of the teachings their bible possesses. It is funny how those aforesaid(prenominal) religious groups that try to mend by that gay marriage is a sin are the uniform bulk that are protesting to band their baby birdrens public schools of religious content and practices.The legal separation of Church and State has been put into place in many U. S. cities. crafty this, I do not understand how any giving medication is to watch out the rules on the separation of church and state, but then be habituated the right to place laws against gay marriage solely based of the Bibles written wo rd. Homosexuals do not spend time going around vocalizing straightaway people that they are not allowed to engage in sex act until marriage, while thats in the bible. The Bible vs. The Constitution seems to play the biggest lineament in the argument against gay marriage.People pretend stated, the character should be flip-flopd, its outdated. However, their entire argument is incorporating the first amendment right of freedom of speech. before the constitution was written, going against the government was unlawful. No one was allowed to speak their minds. I sack out that even in the bible when one went against what god said they were penalize or put to death. Heterosexuals dont the likes of accredited rights in the constitution that go against their own personal beliefs, but will give and cater to others, like freedom of speech.Without some of those rights it would be unlawful for me to save up this paper. Plus, I would bind been murdered some time ago for organism a wh ite and black, bisexual man. what most fail to realize is that yes the bible thought of gays as a sin but it also listed a number of other acts as sin. If our lives were truly run solely by the Bibles scriptures, Gay marriage would be the last of the straight persons problems. curiously when most of the worlds murders are committed by heterosexuals. I personally do not like to base my arguments off a source unless I plan to use the entire source as foundation.I cannot submit the constitution is wrong solely off on right I do not agree with. But turn around and accept the others that cater to my better living. That would label me as a hypocrite. Just like how many people use their religious beliefs to fight gay rights, but fail to follow other aspects of the bibles teachings. I am just human, who am I to judge anyone. This is just one of the many cases why I can argue that many of the firm debaters against gay marriage are set in hypocritical views. People against gay marriage seize that marriage is dedicated to get-go a family.They argue that with marriage you name children and build a happy home. However, for many people, marriage is more about love and mutual trust than about starting a family, and so they would affirm that gay marriage is not an issue. So for those who say its only to start a family, I would call this a delusional fantasy. For one t here are more broken homes in the world now than anything. Now yes, Homosexual couples cannot physically reproduce on their own. However, this does not give reason cogency to deny the couple the right to marry. There are heterosexual couples that cannot physically have children of their own as well.There are many women out in the world that cannot bear children due to a legion(predicate) amount of health issues. My own aunt Kelly was told that she can never have children of her own. Her body just doesnt have the strength and or decent functioning organs to create life. The same goes for many men. I ha ve a neighbor that recently told me that he has a condition that denies him the ability to produce reproductive sperm. As he likes to say, he is shooting blanks. penetrative this I didnt see any government laws stopping them from acquire married. My aunt was told about her inabilities to birth, over 20 years ago.Today she has been married twice. May I remind you that she is a heterosexual woman that cannot have children of her own and is still legally allowed to marry. In todays world, in that location are many alternative options for couples to start a family. The most popular way is adoption. Also, in that respect is much more controversy no-a-days regarding adoption . It has be tot apparent that more and more Homosexual couples are going away(p) of the United States to adopt children. They are forced to go outside of the United states due to the fact that they are not legally allowed to adopt here in the states.Lesbian and gay-parented families may be more likely than oth ers to implicate members from more than one ethnic group . So because the government wants to discriminate against the homosexual lifestyles, there are more and more American children left hand without a home. No one that can legally adopt them is stepping up for the responsibility. It is true that you truly respect something more that you have to fight for. My grand pay off used to tell me this since I was really young. There are so many heterosexuals out there that are horrible parents or that become the gift of parenting for granted.They do drugs and make extreme decisions that break up their families or make the decision to rid themselves of the responsibility of parenting all together. I speak from person experience. As a young boy at the age of 5, my mother gave me and my 5 younger siblings up to child protective services. At the time she chose her friends and her drug abuse over her children and family. She did not care whether we would be okay or not, she dropped me off with only 1 shoe. All my mother cared about was being commensurate to get high without the guilt of us seeing her do it.I ended up back in the family, but my siblings were all separated some are still in the system. Now I personally have never seen a homosexual couple that are bad parents. It is usually the exact opposite. Homosexual couples have to fight in order to build their families so they try not to do anything to mess that chance up. I have also never met a homosexual couple that didnt want children. Along with starting families, those against gay marriage also argue that children brought up in a same-sex marriage theaterhold are taught morals and beliefs.Some say that this fibre of household is poisonous to the child, that it teaches them to go against our creator. what if their families do not component in the same religious beliefs as others. Contrary to what most assume, there are many people that do not cogitate in God. Just like there are many grows that believe in gay rights. So no one can make the solid ground of their argument on the creator when not everyone believes in him. Also, they like to say that by growing up in a gay household, the child is going to turn gay. the association between religious attendance and attitudestoward gay marriage is mediated by a belief that sexual orientation is a choice rather than innate & . This is so ridiculous in so many ways. For one being gay is not a disease, you cant just catch it. Being gay is not something you inhabit like a accent. People are not do gay they are born gay its just a matter of when they decide to accept it. I was raised in a house with a male and female parenting role, and I still knew I was different. I am a bisexual male and so are many of my friends. These friends of mine were raised in all types of different households, but cognise were raised in same-sex households.At the same time I have 3 friends that were adopted and raised by deuce homosexual men and not a single on e of them are gay. They are all in heterosexual relationships and never once thought of being with the same-sex. These are a few examples of discrimination against gay marriage. Another major problem with gay marriage that people are beginning to argue is the doctor of heterosexual couples. many an(prenominal) people argue that the world will change for heterosexual couples if same-sex marriages were allowed. Income taxes is one on the many reasons they have behind this outrages claim.Many people are in the belief that income taxes will be increased. Also, the IRS gives certain credits and benefits to those individuals that have children and other dependants. Heterosexuals believe that the government will be forced to apply the same financial benefits and credits on income taxes towards homosexual couples which they believe will lower everyones benefits. Along with their income taxes, theyre under the assumption that social security taxes will increased and the benefits decrease i f the government has to provide accommodation for these same-sex married couples.One of the more common beastly claims is regarding heath care. People are arguing that their medical insurance premiums will rise based on these stereotypical images of homosexual lifestyles. They have ever believed that homosexuals get diseases and illnesses like Aids or HIV easier than heterosexuals. Based on this belief they think that there will be a higher(prenominal) health care needs associated to the treatment of these more at try diseases. These potential changes in circumstances do not hold comme il faut credibility to deny a person the right to join the institution of marriage.It is unethical to claim the power to control if someone can get married. Most of the world believes Gay marriage is unethical. I have to differ with that assumption. This is another way that heterosexuals choose to be hypocrites. Using Arranged marriage as an example, I prove my case. Mostly everyone in the world, whether homosexual or heterosexual, can agree that arranged marriage is unethical. Many people believe that all want arranged marriage is wrong because you should have the right to choose whom you marry. So how is that any different than what homosexuals want.Homosexuals are also being denied the chance to marry who they choose. Again being hypocritical People believe Marriage is about love and commitment. two homosexuals and those forced into arranged marriages are victims. Neither gets to decide what they want to do, how to live, who to love. The only difference between the two is that at least arranged marriage is marriage. The couple that is actually in love cannot be married. When two people fall in love, they all want the same thing. They dream of this life together, married, with a family, and more. Why should homosexuals be revoked that reality.It should not matter if you are gay or straight, you should be able to get married if you want. On another note I also, do not beli eve that anyone should have to travel away from home to legally get married. Some people have to travel multiple states away, because none of the states near them allow same-sex marriage. The day that all 50 states come to the same decision accepting gay marriage will not come anytime soon, but I do hope I am still alive to see a close size amount of them take a hop the bandwagon. This is one way that would begin to solve the issue.When it comes to gay marriage, I believe the classical theory of Utilitarianism would help solve many of the problems. Utilitarianism is a eventful theory. It is the view that the morally right action is the action that produces the most good . The Utilitarian view seeks to maximize the overall good in a situation. In other words, one should always act in a way that produces the greatest good for the greatest number of people. It is proven that there are fewer people against same-sex marriage, than for it. So the theory of Utilitarianism is the best di ssolvent to the issue the ethical problems of gay marriage.If the government acted with utilitarian views, then we would have less anger, debate, spend less money on a unneeded battle. Along with this view one would also need a recognize perspective of the issue. A clear perspective of the issue of same-sex marriage would be relativism. Relativism is the idea that ones beliefs and values are understood in terms of ones society, culture, or even ones own individual values . It is the philosophical concept that all points of view are equally valid, and that all truth is relative to the individual .Both sides that are involved realize that neither side will ever agree nor neither side is right or wrong. Each Society, culture or religious group is formed by its own ethical values and beliefs, with how they see things to be right and wrong. I believe that when it comes to gay marriage everyone is going to have to agree to disagree. Religion is the top reason to why people are against sa me-sex marriage. What church goers fail to realize is that they are forcing their religious beliefs onto not only the homosexuals but to all.Everyone has their own views and when Homosexuals try to interpreter theirs, they are attacked, (metaphorically). The only way that this problem is ever going to get anywhere is if both sides try to understand that just because everyone doesnt share your same views and beliefs, that doesnt make them wrong. The cannot ignorantly believe that everyone automatically shares their beliefs. Homosexuals are already at this point, they are the hypocrites in this situation. All they want is equality, the same equality that everyone else has been fighting for all these years.In conclusion, I have indentified the ethical issue of gay marriage and explored the ethical problems gay marriage presents including the pros and cons. I then explained how the classical theory of Utilitarianism would resolve those problems. I continued by contrasting the theoretica l solution with perspective of relativism towards gay marriage. Lastly, I went over which view is the closest to my own personal outlook of gay marriage. I do not believe that there should even be much(prenominal) a thing as gay marriage. The title itself is discriminatory.Gay people do not go around referring to a heterosexual couples marriage as straight marriage. So why should a society filled with diverse lifestyles be allowed to refer to homosexual marriages as gay marriage. Marriage is marriage, either way. It should not be labeled as any other. Whether, heterosexual or Homosexual, its the same institution and should hold the same rights. At the end of the day I am a firm believer that the discrimination against gay marriage should be outlawed. Gay people do value the institution of marriage, because their relationship and want to marry is ethical in my eyes.References Driver, J. (2009, June 21). The History of Utilitarianism. Retrieved from Stanford cyclopedia of philosoph ical system http//plato. stanford. edu/archives/sum2009/entries/utilitarianism-history/ Haider-Markel, D. P. (2008). Beliefs about the origins of homosexuality and support for gay rights. macrocosm Opinion Quarterly, 72, pp. 291310. doi10. 1093/poq/nfn015 Mosser, K. (2010). Introduction to Ethics and Social Responsibility. San Diego Bridgepoint Education, Inc. Patterson, C. J. (2013). Children of Lesbian and Gay Parents Psychology, Law, and Policy.Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 1(S), 2734. Rosenfeld, M. J. (2007). The age of independence Interracial Unions, Same-sex Unions, and the Changing American Family. Cambridge, MA Harvard University. Swoyer, C. (2010, December 21). Relativism. Retrieved from Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy http//plato. stanford. edu/entries/relativism/ Todd, N. R. , & Ong, K. S. (2012). Political and Theological Orientation as Moderators for the Association Between spectral Attendance and Attitudes Toward Gay Marriage for White Christians. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 4(1), 5670.