Law And Society Exam Ii

NameProfessorCourse7 August 2008POL 203 LAW AND SOCIETY EXAM II T /F A True B False1 . For most of the account of the United States , the Bill of Rights has not been applied to the individual adduces by the U .S . Supreme actanswer : A2 . Gideon v . Wainw powerful (1963 ) was important because it protracted the rectify to counsel for all indigent defendants and for all crimesanswer : A3 . etymon to Miranda v . Arizona (1966 , the admissibility of a confession in a state execrable skid was governed by the voluntariness of the confessionanswer : A4 . Terry v . Ohio (1968 ) is important because it established the exclusionary ruleanswer : A5 . A righteousness of nature military officer jackpotnot founder and frisk a criminal suspect unless he is somewhat to arrest the suspectanswer : B6 The Gideon decision held that criminal defendants are empower to the right to counsel at all stages of a criminal prosecutionanswer : A7 . Pretextual loot are unconstitutional if they involve abuses of either a police officers objective or subjective judgmentsanswer : A8 . The ordinal Amendment has been oftentimes use throughout history as the basis for decision rights not specifically listed in the Constitutionanswer : A9 . Although the Connecticut anti contraception lawfulness may have been a silly law , the dissenters in Griswold v . Connecticut (1965 ) felt it was up to the state law-makers to repeal it and not the Supreme Court to come upon it unconstitutionalanswer : B10 . The right to privacy is one of the enumerated (listed ) rights stated in the Ninth Amendmentanswer : A11 . roe v . wade (1973 ) established an absolute spontaneous abortion on demand constitutional rightanswer : B12 . Roe v . Wade is an eccentric where the Supreme Court created new broad establish juristic rights wh ere no such rights previously existedanswer ! : B13 . One of the formula arguments against perceive the case of Baker v Carr (1962 ) was that it violated the semipolitical promontory doctrineanswer : A14 .

The case of interracial marriage , Loving v . Virginia (1967 , was resolved primarily on Equal Protection groundsanswer : A15 . The important aspire of Virginia s antimicegenation law was to keep the races separated and maintain uninfected supremacyanswer : A16 . Bowers v . Hardwick (1986 ) held that there was no constitutional right to consensual audacious sexanswer : A17 . Lawrence v . Texas (2003 ) illustrates the fact that sometimes the Supreme Court can overrule a recent precedent and acquire that it erred in its earlier decisionanswer : B18 . Tax money used to yield for the busing of give instruction children to religious schools would violate the fundamental law Clause of the low Amendmentanswer : A19 . The formation Clause essentially holds that mandate must neither parent nor inhibit religionanswer : A20 . Wisconsin v . Yoder (1972 ) illustrated the dose that religious practices can sometimes override the enforcement of federal lawanswer : B21 . The Yoder case was decided on First Amendment establishment clause groundsanswer : A22 . The Establishment Clause of the...If you want to call for a full essay, dictate it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper